A study of selected film-developer pairs
The properties of a film-developer combination are usually described by various, more or less well-defined parameters. One of these is the film speed, a parameter that can be determined relatively easily both in practice and, together with the slope (gamma value), by measuring the density curve (-> details). Resolution, sharpness and graininess are less easy to describe and determine. The focus here is mostly on subjective impressions and descriptions; there are practically no quantitative statements on this.
The reason for this may be that in pictorial photography, it is ultimately always the subjective impression that is decisive and not abstract figures that are perhaps only of academic interest. Nevertheless, it seemed interesting to me to explore whether subjective experiences and impressions are also reflected in quantitative figures. To this end, I developed a procedure that allows quality parameters of film-developer combinations to be determined and compared.
The method for determining the resolution is based on the microscopic evaluation of the image of a reference structure (Siemens star). This evaluation is carried out completely numerically and analytically, and no subjective evaluation is performed at any point. Together with the resolution, the method provides reference values for the edge sharpness and the susceptibility to bloom (halo) of a film-developer combination. (-> Details).
The determination of the key figures of the grain structure is based on the microscopic evaluation of evenly exposed areas of optical density D=1. This is an extension of the method proposed by KODAK for determining the RMS granularity. (-> Details).
Database
The selection of the films and developers examined is based on many years of practical experience, during which, purely subjectively, some combinations have proved better or more attractive than others. As mentioned above, achieving a high subjective image sharpness was always the primary goal. I added some films and developers for the sake of completeness and out of curiosity, as prompted by the manufacturers' information. The following compilation resulted from this:
When selecting the films, I limited myself to Kodak and Ilford films and examined in particular the modern flat crystal (T-grain) films of the T-Max and Delta series. TriX, as the classic for street photography, was important as a reference, and PanF as the representative of classic films with low sensitivity and high resolution. Useful when working with large apertures in bright daylight to achieve the desired image effect.
Among the developers, we find D76 and XTOL as representatives of an old and modern universal developer, along with a series of developers that are advertised for particularly high resolution and image sharpness. I used the developer created by Klaus Wehner for several years, along with others. It has been distributed by Jobo as ‘Jobo Alpha’ since December 2022.
The exact times and temperatures of the development can be found together with further details and the measured density curves on the individual pages of the films.(->Details).
Results: personal rating
In the ISO 400 film class, Kodak Tmax400 (TMY), developed in Wehner/Alpha, delivers outstanding results in terms of resolution and edge sharpness.
In all developers tested, Kodak Tmax400 (TMY) shows better values than the competing Ilford film Delta400.
For Kodak Tmax100, Ilford Delta100 and Ilford PanF, Spur SD2525 would be the first choice in terms of resolution and edge sharpness, although the TMY - Wehner/Alpha combination is not surpassed.
Ilford PanF is outstanding in terms of edge sharpness with all developers tested, but not better than Kodak TMX in terms of grain. However, PanF with ISO 40 is typically 2 stops less sensitive than Kodak TMX.
The developer ADOX FX39 shows a stronger development halo and is not recommended for ISO 400 class films.
Kodak XTOL consistently provides the lowest RMS granularity; no significant difference in granularity between flat crystal and classic films can be determined
The classic D76 developer delivers surprisingly good results in the upper mid-range in all parameters.
Results: full details
Short | Manufacturer Label | quoted ISO |
---|---|---|
PanF | Ilford PanF Plus | 50 |
Delta100 | Ilford Delta 100 Professional | 100 |
TMX | Kodak T-MAX 100 Professional | 100 |
Delta400 | Ilford Delta 400 Professional | 400 |
TriX | Kodak Professional TriX 400 | 400 |
TMY | Kodak Professional T-MAX 400 | 400 |
Short | Manufacturer Label | Comment, manufacturer's specifications |
---|---|---|
D76 | Kodak D76 professional | classical, metol-hydroquinone developer |
XTOL | Kodak XTOL Professional | Modern developer based on phenidone and ascorbic acid |
FX39 | ADOX FX-39 II | Further development of Neofin-Rot, balanced sharpness and grain |
Rodinal | ADOX Rodinal/Adonal | Remake of Agfa Rodinal, increases sharpness |
Wehner/Alpha | Jobo Alpha | Developed by Klaus Wehner, since December 2022 Jobo Alpha |
SD2525 | SPUR SD2525 | optimized for resolution and sharpness |